>>55025969The picture you're looking at was traced off the 3D model instead of making official art, then printed out on a crappy printer that didn't have enough ink, then the paper it was on was scanned (likely by the same crappy printer), and then that scan was compressed and had its background removed in Photoshop, and then it was likely downloaded and reposted a dozen other times by a dozen other people across no less than three continents before it made its way to OP's hard drive.
It wasn't AI-generated, but it's been gradually mangled by so many machines that it may as well have been.
