>>55044756>there are no other explanation but being from different universesthis assumes he only had one book, only signed one book, or both.
>he brings that up right before trading booksfor a completely separate reason
>he loved that volume since childhoodvolume doesn't mean an individual copy
>he only had onebold assumption if he was obsessed with it
>he only signed oneeven weirder assumption. The purpose of signing is usually not to lose it or mix it up with others'. If he had multiple, there is no reason to only sign one.
>if there were multiple booksthat doesn't mean there are multiple keys, as that would not make sense for him to implant them in all of the books, but just the copy he has on hand after making the machine
>the professor in our universe would never take his job over his sonAnon, that was the whole plot of the base game
>Holy shit you are stupidHe does not plan on reading it. Ours didn't. We have no reason to believe they suddenly stopped work based on what's in there because ours didn't, while still having access to the white book.
>already explainedfalsely at that
>Julio Verne super sellerThat's quite literally what Heath is in-universe.
writing a lot and responding to many doesn't make you right. In this case, it proved you're a psycho who has circular reasoning and extreme confirmation bias 
