>>55208685So you have no argument all along. Just say that and save yourself several hours.
>>55208926>Except fucking notAny proof? The OP shows it quickly and easily sheathing and unsheathing it's swords at a quarter of the actual speed of the animations, demonstrating its agility and clear mastery of its technique of using swords in a way no human can. You have yet to demonstrate anything to the opposite.
>moving while holdingit rarely needs to, and when it does, it stands up. See IRL bears.
>shifts from animal to creatureThis is irrelevant to the point. it doesn't have to move like a human or a pokemon, and the animation demonstrates it has its own exclusive method of wielding swords and general "getting around" that does indeed work in a vacuum rather nicely.
>forgets how to greentext twice consecutivelylol
>non argument zoomer ad hom about ur mom lmaoYou still have no argument about how it moves retardedly just because you say so.
>daggers would be lightershells are already light. Samurott weigh only around 200 pounds, which is much lighter than an actual seal lion. Not only does that mean it's stronger with more muscle and less fat (visible as its body is much more defined than actual sea lions), but it's further proof that the shells are very light. Thay're just sharp. On top of that, when does it even drag around swords while holding them like you said? That's quite literally never been shown. Why would they do that wen they have storage built right in for the swords?
>>55208937I mean Samurott isn't real either, so this doesn't actually mean anything. Just that your retarded argument of "underwater swordsfighting is inherently stupid in fiction" never made any sense in the first place