>>55338437>represents what Emboar looks likeBy drawing a non-Emboar? Funny
>Yes I did.No, you relied on a shitty image
>it has fire so it's tacked onCare to elaborate? Does any design with Fire seem tacked on to you? This isn't a criticism.
>they're retarded looking but I can't explain howStill waiting for articulation
>it looked bad to begin withthat's a fine opinion to have as well. Now we're just discussing if that's objectively true concerning Ember's design specifically.
>low IQ is anyone who likes Lickilicky more than Emboar seems a little low IQ of a claim anon. It's almost like you shat out that claim without any reasoning behind it.
>You firstjust did. It required consise wording and not relying on shitty images
>it's not an animaldumb point, but sure, I'll humor you. What's wrong with not having a neck in a pokemon? Do you hate Elective and Rilaboom for this same reason? I highly doubt it.
>It's a bad out of place looking designYet you seemingly can't show what's out of place about it
>terrible proportionsYet your only proof of this is an image that doesn't have Ember's proportions
>doesn't match how Pokemon lookYet you can't talk about how and actually articulate why you think this is true.
