>>55348194>We can't talk about what is "characteristic" about a tech that has only existed for less than a decade.By that logic we can't talk about anything or describe them before they hit the 10 year mark, anon.
This is a characteristic that has been constant in every image I come across.
I know that you're trying to say they'll become indistinguishable from other mediums and we won't be able to tell a photograph from AI, or a drawing from AI. This can't really be achieved though. For one, AI images are created a certain way, just like photographs or physical and digital drawings are made a certain way. There's always tell tale signs.
I myself can usually tell something drawn in one program vs another. What makes you think AI images will just become "perfect". If anything sure, they're useful enough for someone who wants a quick graphic and use it commercially (if they are ruled to be legally useful that is, since the datasets themselves infringe on copyright).
