[20 / 2 / 13]
Quoted By: >>55368055 >>55368057 >>55368147 >>55368286 >>55368314
Explain why I shouldn't want Unova remakes.
>IT WOULD LOOK UGLY!!!
The original games already looked incredibly ugly, with remakes I could at least experience Unova with properly modelled Pokemon with better animations instead of the tweened blown up sprites that only had one animation each.
>IT WOULD BE EASIER!!
BDSP was harder than DPPt thanks to EVs and better AI and the originals already had bottom of the barrel difficulty anyway.
>THEY WOULD REMOVE THE BATTLE FACILITIES/POSTGAME!!
BW already has barebones postgame, and Unova doesn't have a Battle Frontier to remove, and including the PWT wouldn't even make sense with the events of BW1, so excluding it makes sense. There's no evidence they would remove the Subway either since BDSP kept DP's Battle Tower and expanded on it.
Even if ILCA did BW remakes, it would objectively be better than originals because unlike DPPt there's nothing of value to remove.
>IT WOULD LOOK UGLY!!!
The original games already looked incredibly ugly, with remakes I could at least experience Unova with properly modelled Pokemon with better animations instead of the tweened blown up sprites that only had one animation each.
>IT WOULD BE EASIER!!
BDSP was harder than DPPt thanks to EVs and better AI and the originals already had bottom of the barrel difficulty anyway.
>THEY WOULD REMOVE THE BATTLE FACILITIES/POSTGAME!!
BW already has barebones postgame, and Unova doesn't have a Battle Frontier to remove, and including the PWT wouldn't even make sense with the events of BW1, so excluding it makes sense. There's no evidence they would remove the Subway either since BDSP kept DP's Battle Tower and expanded on it.
Even if ILCA did BW remakes, it would objectively be better than originals because unlike DPPt there's nothing of value to remove.
