>>55386983considering the nature of time and causality all it takes is, at some point
(i'm dead certain it happened in 2013 personally) someone or something travelling to the past, which is only technically unfeasible and not at all prevented by laws of physics. if something changed the past (possible) it could have effects on the present (observable - see berenstain). the only difficult part to explain would be people remembering the present as it was before the past changed, for which i offer no explanation besides that i experienced it and have personally confirmed that many others with no prior knowledge of the issue have also experienced it - all of whom were shocked by the information and none of whom remembered things ever being as they are now. it's an easy mistake for one person to make, it's not easy for it to be so consistent with so many unrelated people. i prefer a physical explanation - the past changed and the present is just like this now - to some bullshit sociological mass hysteria shite they always seem to say when something legitimately strange happens.
