Only top two tiers are ordered. I guess uncrowned Zamazenta was supposed to be Zacian, but they both suck.
>>55400625Nothing in the bottom tiers is unexpected, but M-Lucario over normal lucario and Passimian in A are odd choices. Why did you put them there?
>>55400672Pretty baller, a lot of respect for gen 1 and 2.
>>55400678Blaziken and Breloom in S, you love to see it.
>>55400711I like your top tiers, but Falinks doesn't deserve to be that low.
>>55400719Weird list, despite me agreeing with most of it.
>>55400728Great list, but you definitely want to have sex with 90% of your top two tiers
>>55400740Very good list.
>>55400756One of the weirder ones, but oddly coherent even thought I don't agree with a lot of the placements.
>>55400797This might be my least favourite list in the thread man. It's like it's made to upset me.
>>55400813Likes bara, not for me.
>>55400845Lucario seems like it should be higher, what makes you dislike it.
>>55400848Pawmot made the cut?
>>55400896Pretty good, especially the top tier
>>55400903Even more love for Breloom, alright list.
>>55400914I like this list. It's funny that you say you aren't big on humanoids, because they seem evenly distributed throughout.
>>55400917Good A tier, but aside from that it's not for me.
>>55400933Crabrawler that high is the only thing that confuses me.
>>55400934Pretty good, though I agree with the other anon that Toxicroak should be higher.
>>55400947Will specifically go out of your way to use female pokemon.
>>55400953I feel like I can kind of see the logic to this one, but I'm not certain. Still good though.
>>55400970You put all the gen one fighting types in S, except for the best one. You're also probably the only person to put the Tauros forms in different tiers.
>>55401005Very nice.
>>55401051Breloom in C is criminal dude.
>>55401060I like this list a lot, nothing seems wildly far from where it should be.
>>55401114Do you like Crabominable even though it's barely a crab?
