>>55507272>Just because you say it doesn't make it any more true than the last hundred times you said itbut it clearly must be true. if you hated laziness then you would realize that megas are bad
>Please define what a lazy design is, because your standards for good design are nonsensical at bestnotice how all megas, like the one you posted right now, just slap a bunch of shit haphazardly all over older pokemon
now compare that to froslass which looks entirely different from snorunt
>Dumbass, have you seen most of the new Pokemon designs?the rare times in which a new one is good still beats all mega evolutions, regional variants, paradox mons, gigantamax mons, and convergent evolutions
>Gen 5 is full of Pokemon whose sole purpose is to be an obvious replacement for older Pokemonnone of the mons in gen 5 look anything like older mons. how are they replacing them?
>But if they did change Kangaskhan's design for the Mega you'd just complain that it's too derivative and lazyif kangaskhan get a new form that made as much changes as say, gyarados does to magikarp, dragonite does to dragonair or froslass does to snorunt, no, maybe i wouldn't hate it
>who feels compelled to shit up any thread you see talking about Megasthat's because megas are one of the worst things that ever happened to this series and they need to be ridiculed 24/7 as well as niggers like you who defend them
