Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.
[92 / 11 / 1]

Is Pokémon simply mediocre?

No.55688793 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
In other series, there is usually some consensus about which games are the best entries (FFVI, VII and FFT for final fantasy) but with Pokemon, it seems that every game has some collection of flaws that makes it mediocre
>RBY
bland region, full of glitches, unbalanced, no postgame beyond Mewtwo
>GSC
Level curve, Jotho is small, Kanto is empty, most of the neW mons are weak and cant be caught during the campaign anyway
>RSE
No day/Night, too much water routes with uninteresting mons, killed pokemania
>DPP
Slow as fuck, boring region made for HM slaves, no fire pokemon
>BW
Edgy story, linear region, ugly mons you're forced to use
>BW2
Rehashed region, stupider story, nu-pokemon
>XY
Bland region, KANTOOOO pandering, too easy, shit story, empty post game, gimmicky
>S/M/USUM
Cutscene fest, handholdey,cringe story, more gimmicks
>SWSH
DEX CUT, fucking easy, shitty post game, DLCS, multi exp, glitchy
>SV
Glitchy, no houses, dex cut, tranny designs, too easy, no post game at all

>Remakes
Frlg is bland + no crowbat. h
HGSS fixes nothing, ORAS is ugly+no battle frontier. BDSP is an insult to customers overall.
To fair though, the least shat on games seem to be Red and Blue since they were the first and Emerald because the new
additions compensates for R/S's flaws