>>55950591>The entire point of the entries is to describe the speciesTo describe what’s known about the species, yes. The Galar fossils and Paradoxes for instance are described with what is known about them, but the reader can infer otherwise.
>would be pointless Wrong! See: Galar fossils, newer entries regarding other fossil mons, paradoxes, Masuda’s interview on the Weather duo.
>PLA outright states the form we see of arceus is a fragment of the real one.Cool! The Arceus you receive in PLA is a fragment of the Almighty Unknowable (or the Great Depth in the Japanese script- bet you didn’t know that). What does that have to do with an outer being meticulously shaping a universe (according to the mythology) versus causing a Big Bang?
