>>55964040I have a source, retard. You’re refusing to read it.
>>55965217Like I said, they associate a Pokemon with where it was “originally discovered” and the region is always the one where it was introduced. Thus allowing us to say “Kanto Pokemon” and be referring to the 151 and “Kalos Pokemon” and be referring to the 72 far shittier ones.
>>55965239Thanks for demonstrating how you fail to address criticism by inventing an argument no one made and attacking that because you can’t actually refute your opponent’s criticism, thus making you retarded.
