>>56045414>shit pokemonSubjective design wise, objectively untrue statistically
>shit routesThe objectively worst route, Route 5, has objectively more to do on it than Kanto Route 7
>shit environmentsSubjective aesthetically, and on a thematic level it's not that much different than any of the previous games unless you want to bring seasons into it
>shit charactersSubjective design wise, objectively Bianca has the most well rounded character arc of the first 5 games and afterwards the only characters that approach the same level of depth are in SV. Outside of that it is more or less standard for a Pokemon game but nothing stands out as exceptionally bad in comparison to the rest of the games.
>shit trainersLimiting the gym leaders to 3 Pokemon isn't great, probably would be the third or fourth change I'd make to the game personally.
>shit battlesThis sort of feels like repeating the last point? Or maybe the last point was a bad combination of the other two points. It's not like there's that many good wild Pokemon fights outside of Gen 7 anyway.
>shit plot>shit evil teamIt's average to above average for Pokemon, at least better than DP or XY if we're comparing first versions.
>shit legendariesSubjective design wise, but I do find one of Kyurem's forms sucking so hard to be funny personally
>shit elite 4>shit championOn the first run through they aren't great yeah, although there's at least story reasons for it. Still, Alder's gimmick being sucking does lead to a meh final battle for the post-game, especially if you encountered the fun Cynthia battle earlier. I'd argue XY is worse as it commits similar sins with zero story reason, so yeah blame BW for doing it first that's cool.
>shit postgameIt's reasonable, about DP levels which is respectable. It's no third version or GS, but it's not nothing. Hell, even SM had a similar postgame, so I wouldn't blame BW for bad postgames like XY or DLC-less SS/SV (I will blame the latter two for selling you postgame).
