>>56109257>Yes.Retard. Just have it only take effect in single player, which is 99 percent of gameplay. You're just sperging at this point.
>how it would actually work for both playersYou would just wait for the turn to end. Now let's get back to enjoying the other 99 percent of the game be faster. Other games have solved this before. You're just sperging at this point.
>not vague at allYes it is. "It's designed differently" doesn't magically excuse the absence of every feature ever just because (You) declared it to be in retrospect. You're just sperging at this point.
>you forced the devs to waste timemost other example require minimal effort
>shitty featureWhat makes this universally loved feature worse than whatever alternative feature you're thinking about that it would supposedly detract from? In our previous hypotheticals, the game was exactly the same except with/without the old feature returning and you STILL argued it was better to remove it since the game "wasn't designed for it". That's objective bullshit. You're just spergiing at this point.
>>56110842>Splitting destroys the point of it existingIf the point of it existing is overselling and trivializing, then splitting is a good thing for balancing members instead.
>it sucksHow?
>you're asking for long animationsShow me one person that did this. The Gamecube games just happen to have long animations, but they're also relatively good animations.
>The animations are already consistently good.No, they were terrible and inconsistent and we're only now starting to get consistently good ones in PLA and SV, with work remaining to be done.
>People were mad at BOTW?No one liked it BECAUSE of what it cut you fucking retard.
>>56110861>function is now uselessMaybe in multiplayer, yes. The other 99 percent of the game can now enjoy custom speed, though.
