>>56117340>>56117369>>56117183>No, because the subject if the post is “XY is better than BW” and not “I want to go back to XY”The subject of the thread was "Which game has the most content?". The OP asks if HGSS is it. This post
>>56115679 has an infographic which contains some information including HGSS directly comparing it to other games, but the poster of that image could simply not have a version of that image with Emerald content. This is a clear case of omission, of which we can't be sure of motivation. At best it's apathy, but it could also be ignorance, but when it comes down to it you can't glean motivation from it.
>>56117388I mean, I never argued Emerald has less content than the DS games, it's probably roughly on par when you remove actual garbage like Musicals or the Battle Palace. I didn't make it clear in my first post
>>56116486 which I apologize for. Let me be clear then. I think Emerald and the DS titles have a pretty solid postgame (alongside FRLG, wouldn't want to ommit that) and overall content. I'd say similar things for USUM, but the unskippable cutscenes during the campaign don't make for a fun time. On the other hand, XY lacks good or fun content, similar to DLC-less SS. I did not play SV, and refuse to due to structural changes that I strongly dislike. I think RS has a solid campaign, and Gen 1 can be fun for a quick playthrough as well despite not really working. I personally like GSC, and they've got a lot going on, but HGSS is just better overall. I'd say similar things about DP compared to Platinum but without any of the nice things to say about DP. If you want, I can summarize this into general tiers if you want some accurate summaries in a less rambling way.
