>>56230340>N is ultimately just wrongNot really, he's wrong in some of his views, but not all of them. That's the point. Trying to spin this into a conflict of absolute ideals vs absolute truth is not just boring but superficial too: again, both N and the protagonist carry both idealistic and truthful beliefs in them, like every normal human. Not only that, but this is literally the real point GF was trying to convey by making truth and ideals interchangeable in the story.
>On the contrary, they care greatlyJust because you say so. There's nothing that confirms this in the lore. For all we know, if the original being cared about sides, it would have taken the side of one of the brothers. Instead it split to support both of them equally.
Also, you keep bringing that "N is ultimately wrong" as a point, but this is true regardless of if he represents the truth or ideals: in both games he's defeated and shown to be manipulated by Ghetsis into his misguided beliefs. So bringing up that "he's wrong" not only does nothing to support your argument, but since this is true regardless of the dragon that joins him, it pretty much proves that the dragons do NOT care about truth or wrong.
>>>>>Zekrom awakens to and joins forces with N *because* he is an idealist"Reshiram awakens to and joins forces with N *because* he is fighting for the truth he believes in"
"Zekrom awakens to and joins forces with the protagonist *because* they're fighting for an ideal future they believe in"
I can do the same thing. These are not arguments, just an affirmations.
>Ideals in this case means "values" or "vision"Sure, but if you wanna play the "interpretation card", you can argue the exact same thing for what "truth" means in the context of the story.
They were left ambiguous and interchangeable for a reason.
