[159 / 31 / 1]
Quoted By: >>56289360 >>56289369 >>56289377 >>56289380 >>56289385 >>56289403 >>56289710 >>56289827 >>56290292 >>56290411 >>56290692 >>56290757 >>56291309 >>56291506 >>56294407 >>56294483 >>56296104 >>56296221
is this Lockstin's worst video?
>Doesn't understand the appeal of a someone's beloved favorite Pokemon being elevated to the status of god
>complains the megas are temporary when the whole point is that it still your loyal mon beneath all the spikes and can return to the form you're actually attached to
>seems to think the thing people like about megas "new form" and not the super saiyan power up which is an anime staple.
>claims that regionals make a pokemon relevant when they do nothing for the original Pokémon and if anything just make the original look blander and/or weak in comparison
>claims that Pokemon don't need to be competitive to be relevant, and his argument for this uses Furfrou as an example, a forgettable piece of shit that game freak erased from the franchise for the entirely of Gen 8 and 9, aand even he himself calls it a "set piece" rather than an actual creature anyone could actually like "lets' objectify this dog"
The only arguments of his that hold water are the KANTOOOOOOOO basis (Which even this doesn't quite work because Beedrill and Pidgeot needed them), and how so few Pokémon actually got them (which can be solved by giving out more of them to three stage Pokemon that needed them and starters that got skipped), and how megas ruined competitive (which can be solved by rebalancing which they already were in the process of doing in SM).
>Doesn't understand the appeal of a someone's beloved favorite Pokemon being elevated to the status of god
>complains the megas are temporary when the whole point is that it still your loyal mon beneath all the spikes and can return to the form you're actually attached to
>seems to think the thing people like about megas "new form" and not the super saiyan power up which is an anime staple.
>claims that regionals make a pokemon relevant when they do nothing for the original Pokémon and if anything just make the original look blander and/or weak in comparison
>claims that Pokemon don't need to be competitive to be relevant, and his argument for this uses Furfrou as an example, a forgettable piece of shit that game freak erased from the franchise for the entirely of Gen 8 and 9, aand even he himself calls it a "set piece" rather than an actual creature anyone could actually like "lets' objectify this dog"
The only arguments of his that hold water are the KANTOOOOOOOO basis (Which even this doesn't quite work because Beedrill and Pidgeot needed them), and how so few Pokémon actually got them (which can be solved by giving out more of them to three stage Pokemon that needed them and starters that got skipped), and how megas ruined competitive (which can be solved by rebalancing which they already were in the process of doing in SM).
