>>56308322true, sinnoh is just fine. remake culture is retarded and is ruining gaming
>>56308408zoomer post, literally nobody who actually played sinnoh thought it was slow until xy/oras babies started having youtube and forum access.
i thought people were joking about underage posting but the constant parotting of "too slow" and "bad level curve" convinced me, less than 15% of this board is 18 or older.
>>56308446BDSP are an embarrassing remake, but sinnoh is inherently good so BDSP are actually good core games with additional flaws tacked on.
they even removed HMs so the zoomzooms would stop bitching about them and it didn't help because nobody who thinks gen 4 is too slow or has too many HMs actually played a sinnoh game.
here's a fun science fact: hoenn requires the same number of HMs as sinnoh, and nobody bitches about it there except for contrarian jackasses or SWSH brats.
>>56309694mechanically i agree, gen 4 is far too modern for an overhaul like HGSS. it would have been nice to see sinnoh on the scale of some of galar's towns, except... actually functional towns lmfao, but there was no way it was happening.
there was a time in my life when the only video game i could play was pokemon sapphire, so i have a lot of memories of hoenn and revisiting ruby has been neat. i'm also playing alpha sapphire to compare to ruby *and* my decade+ old memories; ORAS sucks by comparison. yes, it has more modern features, and sure, the graphics are 3d, but as a whole experience it isn't as fun. too much handholding, too much pandering to babies, but soar is cool(even if it was ripped off from ranger 3).
in a way, i'm glad sinnoh didn't get the baby-pandering treatment; BDSP have harder fights than DP ever did, and that's cool.
>>56309709single use TMs are cool but unncessary and they removed them anyway, megas are okay but eh, i don't like gimmicks much despite liking XY.
player customisation is cool, i'll give you that.
