>>56357599Lol, so you are claiming that the moment they came up with the concept of Pokemon is THE EXACT SAME MOMENT of where they made the cut of what is a Pokemon? Nowhere in the development process would be any trace/mention of Pokemon/Pocket Monsters before that exact moment? They were called Capsule Monsters before they made the 150/151 cut and zero trace of Pokemon/Pocket Monsters is to be found before? I don't think so. The creative process is way more chaotic/organic and things grow gradually.
>>56357605>And therefore don’t count as part of the produc. You are going in circles. I already agreed that they are not used as a part of the final Pokemon. The thing in the OP is not a used Pokemon. And not a part of the final Pokemon.
>It makes no sense to claim that Wimbly Bimbly is how I design characters if the character doesn’t exist in the book.It does make sense if someone would like to take an interest in the overall design process and look at all the unused designs. No one is claiming that the thing in OP is a finalized Pokemon. Imo it looks like shit,
