[12 / 7 / ?]
Quoted By: >>56379916 >>56380676 >>56381952
what are some prehistoric animals that you think would make good fossil/paradox mons?
I think most of the paradox mons we got are lazy. Most of them don't seem to be based on any particular animal, they just reuse the same four or five features on each mon (pointy teeth, spikes, hair, face paint or eye liner, etc.). It makes them very repetitive and cookie cutter. Gouging Fire in particular seemed to be inspired by a Styracosaurus, which is a good idea on paper, but the execution is horrible. All they did was add a frill on the head of entei and call it a day. I'm disappointed that this our our first Styracosaurus pokemon. If fossile pokemon ever come back, GF needs to make a new Stryracosaurus pokemon from the ground up instead of lazily using an older pokemon as a base. Paradox mons were a repulsive, terrible, hideous and atrocious mistake
I think most of the paradox mons we got are lazy. Most of them don't seem to be based on any particular animal, they just reuse the same four or five features on each mon (pointy teeth, spikes, hair, face paint or eye liner, etc.). It makes them very repetitive and cookie cutter. Gouging Fire in particular seemed to be inspired by a Styracosaurus, which is a good idea on paper, but the execution is horrible. All they did was add a frill on the head of entei and call it a day. I'm disappointed that this our our first Styracosaurus pokemon. If fossile pokemon ever come back, GF needs to make a new Stryracosaurus pokemon from the ground up instead of lazily using an older pokemon as a base. Paradox mons were a repulsive, terrible, hideous and atrocious mistake