>>56560591You're boring. I'm all for some nerdy discussion with math and science but you have no idea what you're talking about
>Guess nobody can talk.It's either Gardevoir create visible black hole and there should not be a Pokemon world anymore, or they create tiny black holes at a particle level and then so what?
>No, but we clearly can estimate a mechanism through which wailmer and wailord can still work.Which is? That's not an explanation. That's the kind of boring stuff I'm talking about.
Anime called him the float whale Pokemon, not the swimming down constantly Pokemon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEssmZ9NrlwIf he had to change its density from 0.00104 to 0.998, it would mean its volume would decrease by around 1000.
>Do you shit yourself while sleeping?No, but I don't need to shit constantly. Like, what's your point at the end?
>It creates extremely small ones that cease to existThen again what's the point of insisting on that or even writing a fictional character whose main feat is creating things so tiny you cannot see them, that has no effect and last for not even a millisecond?
>And you need to quote quora?Would you have believe me? You cannot go further than a PHD. You still didn't provide anything, being your own calculation or sources of information. I'm all for some nerdy talk about science, but the only challenge I have debating against you is trying to lower my level because you don't understand density and claim that Wailord is not a whale, instead of just going for the easiest road. The entries are written by the 10 year old main character, who write on their notebook like normal japanese kids do for school.
>Garcois, I told you the exact terms which show how both of these pokemon can work. I won't teach you.Like the other french guy said, it's 'garçon' (you can't even use Google translate for a single word?) and you didn't explain shit and still refuse to give any calculation or ressources.
I'm booooored.
