>>56586935No it's not true because Adonai, Ha shem etc are all words. This is like saying Christians saying 'Lord' are trying to say 'Jesus'.
>Their whole written language and retarded way of NOT writing down vowels was all due to them not wanting the true name of god written down. You can't deny this shit. They use the "four letter word" to refer to god even today (tetragrammaton).Incorrect. It's because of how the language developed. Do you think Hebrew spawned out of thin air? Also if they use the tetragrammaton today (you at least got that right) then it's a pointer to God, not a 'secret name'.
>Early christians avoided using Jesus' nameFunny headcannon. Galatians immediately mentions Jesus. Same as Romans, 1 cor, 2 cor, eph, philippians, col, 1 the, 2 the, 1 tim, 2 tim, tit, philemon, heb, jam, 1 pet, 2 pet, 1 john, 2 john, jude, rev and acts. Literally all of the NT except for the gospel which obviously mention Jesus by His name. Acts was written by 62 AD and we can assume that the majority of Paul's letters were written before that. So you claim there's a less than 30 year window (since people called Him Jesus before the crucifixion obviously) in which they didn't call Him Jesus? I doubt it. BTW in most letters I did find in the first chapter the usage of 'Jesus Christ' or variations therefore much more often than savior.
>>56587006>They all like being absolutely cuckedReading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it?
