>>56849205>Ah yeah, the terrible scores they gave for>>Echoes of Wisdom - 9>>Link's Awakening - 9.4>>Jamboree - 9>>FE Engage - 9>>Mario + Rabbids - 9>>Pikmin 4 - 9>>Three Hopes - 8>>Captain Toad Treasure Tracker - 8Anon, you know your proving his point right?
You're just picking the biggest releases from fan favorite IPs
Meanwhile
>ring fit - 7.8>endless ocean luminous - 4>switch sports - 7>NWC: 7>return to dreamland deluxe - 7The original was 7.5 so rationalise that
>everybody 1-2 switch - 4Which is two lower than the original despite just being a better version of it, even though the game itself still isn't great that makes no sense.
It even happens with Mario and Zelda titles if they're non-kart/party spinoffs.
>Peach Showtime - 7>hyrule warriors DE - 7.5>Super Mario party - 7.3>tennis aces - 7.5>Mario v DK - 7>Wario Ware: GiT - 7>Wario Ware: Move It - 7>Mario + Rabbids - 7.7>golf super rush - 6>Mario & Sonic Tokyo 6.4But of course there's one exception
>Mario 3d world + browser's fury - 7Two down from their original Wii U score.
Pokemon gets it pretty hard too
>PLA - 7>rescue team DX - 6>Indigo Disk - 7>detective pikachu returns - 6>SV - 67 is their average for Nintendo games and they clearly don't give a shit either because none of these games are on the same level quality wise.
And while you might say "anon some of these games are bad they deserve that score" keep in mind that these are the same people who gave the gta trilogy a 5, a game that has so many mistakes, and glitches that it's laughable anyone could think it's a halfway decent game.
Oh and the icing on the cake
>Nintendo switch - 7There's a reason why IGN is a complete laughing stock and why their reviews aren't taken seriously.
