>>56886038>I never said it didYou literally said it was in front and behind the cervix, neither of which are.
>It doesn't need to be studied. Longer torso means longer torso organs, otherwise bigger women would be full of empty organless space.Yes, that is true. The vagina is part of the pelvis, not the torso, and yes that stuff does need to be studied because there is not an exact correlation with it.
>Even if that's correct, that's still significant. That's over an inch of difference between a 5 foot woman and a 6 foot woman.Yes that is true if the correlation was the same between every woman, which it is not. For some the range is only 0.3 in total between 5'2" and 6'2" in the earlier example I made, which is rather irrelevant in all reality for anybody with an average 5-6 inch penis. Once again, every human is different, there is no correlation among certain things, and even in the few cases those are, those correlations vary heavily. For instance, lets say there is a correlation between height and foot size, now most would agree with you. But at the same time said correlation between someone 5'8" and 6'4" could range anywhere between 0.1 inch or 4 inches. The correlation is so wide spread and irrelevant that the data means nothing other than "Height matters", but it also depends on the average, if the average of that data was that every foot only grew 0.1 inches, then the data would suggest "Yes height matters, but it's largely irrelevant". Do you see the point, yes does height matter in the cases for women, sure, but does it actually matter, no, it's largely irrelevant.
