>>56900694>no other plot undermined its entire premiseBW didn't do this though. Show me how they did without strawmannirg the story to pretend it's simple
>no other plot before then constantly intruded your story with an endless array of charactersLike it or not this should have been rewarded so we could get better characters. You shitting on it creates the incentive structure for them to make character one dimensional cardboard ever since. It is your fault.
>no other plot forced you to capture the box legendarySure but that isn't exactly a bad thing because it fits well into the plot and makes the plot giood, despite your grievances. It was clear to anyone they were gonna keep doing that moving forward, but because of your screeching they did it in much more "forced" ways. It is your fault.
>no other plot ended the game with the antagonist's own theme song and his smiling mug to roll in the creditsThis element made the plot good and interesting. Your criticism of it made subsequent plots ass.
>>56900705Anon you literally can't beat "plass" without using the Stantler evo
Also, how does including a mon somehowmake a game worse?
>>56900726>"At least you tried" is empty praise that rewards mediocrityIt depends on how it's used. If I got mediocrity for years and got a slight bump up that's still mediocre in a vacuum, I'd praise it ore than a game that's a step down from excellence but is still excellent. I am constructive with my criticisms.
>how can you not tell what's wrong with itAGain, not saying that it's a perfect story, but it's pretty fucking perfect for a pokemon story and it should have been rewarded relative to previous stories or else they'd over-revert, which they clearly did in the wrong areas.
>we have a problem with failingSure I get it, but see my thoughts above.
