>>56969757>other than the fact that it lines up with the main timelineBut it literally doesn't tho
I know you don't wanna accept it for some reason but Arven's age doesn't line up
>Then it's not an infinite recursion you're just an end with an undefined start>It's not, it's the end, you yourself just said that.That's literally what infinite regress is... what's the end or the beginning depends on your perspective
So what happened to the game MC is basically P1 in this pic
P2 is the journal entry the prof described in their secret lab
And so on
Unless you wanna headcanon that the prof still build a time machine even without the book then I guess but that's headcanon
>turtles all the way down is a western logical fallacyHow does is matter where it's form lmao
>They probably just saw that there was an infinite thing with turtles and designed a pokemon around it without understanding the actual meaning."Probably" huh..... cool headcanon anon
>you haven't once actually tried to explain how your theory worksThe fuck do you MEAN LMAO
Half of this thread is off topic babble explaining this shit, desu I feel bad for OP that a bunch of autists hijacked this thread
Ok anon I have one more proposal
When I'm home this evening I'll make an infographic
Maybe you'll understand when it's something visual because words don't seem to work
>>56969768>Your theory literally doesn't allow for it to be different or the infinite regress ends.Well it doesnt always end but in this case it does
Or starts, as I said it kinda depends on your perspective, but obviously there has to be an end or beginning cause it's a stack of turtles not a circle
>ALSO if you believe the split happened after the book change happened then that just means that the professor we meet is the exact same as the one from the main timelineIt's not the same prof lol
