>>56972765Sure
>>56972909>nopeYep, just look at how light reflects
>it reflects the sameNope, the artwork is way more glossy implying scales. The models reflect in a more matte way that makes it seem like fucking play doh
>>56972928>No it isn'tYes it is, it canonically has rough skin
>>56973054Why do you need to ignore other animations
I'm not ignoring them. I posed a criticism: If Archeops' concept it a bird that sucks at flight at its point in evolution, why does it constantly try to do so indefinitely in ANY situation? Should this be in shirt bursts? My answer to my own question was that it was made for people like (You) who can't tell what a design is without having it fucking perform for you perpetually and therefore an unrealistic way. It shouldn't be an idle animation that loops, but rather a burst, one-time thing.