>>57077326>The differences and similarities are within the same scope.Thing is, you'd be able to actually argue your point if that were the case. Instead you're just stating your point without elaborating.
>but if palworld's inspiration is plagiarism then so is gamefreak's. No.
Being inspired by the same animal isn't plagiarism, neither company created or own the animal conceptually but they managed to make two unique designs.
In the case of Palworld instead of picking a real world animal and making a unique based on it, they took a pokemon and added minor details.
>The only difference is that gamefreak fanboys are like nintendo fanboys but dialled to 11 That would imply they keep to themselves and you wouldn't be wrong give every palworld thread, here, there or everywhere ultimately evolves into shitting on pokemon due to both the lack of meaningful content, characters or lore to discuss and the fact that they know that the game will never escape Pokemon's shadow as long as it continues to copy from it.
>They don't want to accept that their beloved game franchise is cheap trashLet's be honest if pokemon were a trash game series you wouldn't be here right now.
Think about it, you're livid about pokemon right now but people don't get angry over bad game series they laugh at them, just look at concord, tlou 2, dustborne, suicide squad. They're the butt of the joke.
But here, you're not doing that. You're clenching your teeth trying your hardest to convince people it's bad but you can't even do that since you can't compare the two, if you do, you just give people the opportunity to correct you or laugh at Palworld more.
Anyway, point is, your only winning move is to just not reply.
