>>57082075As for the OHKOs by +0 5 deads sucker i count 6/40 = 15%
and that's STILL a 50/50 or even straight up Gambit loss given the set (subs, wow, idef etc)
Zama at +1 BP outspeeds and OHKOs 4/40 mons, and with coverage moves it goes even higher.
>b but why are you considering only sucker then!!!Zama doesn't need sucker as it's the second fastest mon, any move is basically priority.
>LO gambitdoesn't even show up on Pikalytics in terms of usage percentage. You have absolutely zero knowledge of the actual game if you brought that up. And I keep arguing with your 1100 elo ass
>Kingambit alone is mentioned 18 times on the article for Gholdengowho'd have thought that the #1 ghold counter would be mentioned there? woah incredible argument
Cinderace is one of the very few mons that cares about EVing for Sucker as it's a close roll, but you won't see a Wake or an Oger run any HP evs for that, nor any strong attacker. Support roles such as Ace can afford to lower their power as they provide more than that, but contrary to how you framed it, no fully offensive mons cut their attack for Gambit. It's just a delusion or rather, a lie
>Because it's not a central issue and you're completely mistaken on it. Zamazenta doesn't have set varietyso according to you Gambit is OP due to flexibility. But zama's much higher flexibility, somehow, doesn't matter here.
Zama can run
>BP>ID>edge>slam>crunch>rest>roaron HDB or Chesto or lefties, additionally
>CC>ice fangOn Band.
Again, do you even play the game? Are you familiar with the sets? No knowledgeable or honest player would infer that zama has 4MSS when it commonly uses 7+ moves. You are either bad or trolling.
>Its 4th moveslot is always rather low impactThe opposite, it wins or loses the game depending on the set. Which is why i hate that cheap piece of shit, it's gen 7 magearna all over again. Not that you'd know about it
