>>57285533>It’s not splicing it is using context clues.Right but seeing a word in a different sentence and splicing it into another sentence is not how to infer via context clues at all.
>a decade is an absurd reach. AGAIN, I brought it up to show that the "unit" doesn't have to be "gen" like you seem to demand it has to be for no reason.
>Source?The post. He only compared 1 and 5.
>The post says everything after 1 sucksBut this doesn't mean for the same reason he's hating the Gen 5 mons.
>Which would be the next genThis is your assumption. Like I said for a million times, we don't know because "what's next" is an incredibly vague statement to begin with, yet you're trying to force it and pretend it says 'next gen" when it's right in front of my face without saying that at all.
