>>57310686>Should I include regionals/convergents/paradox pokemon in these numbers?Depends on what exactly do you want the image to represent or prove
Both could be interesting in their own way, but not including them would be more representative of actual newly designed Pokémon
Gimmick forms are just, well, gimmick forms, the earlier just gens didn't have any so it's not really a fair comparison
But of course it would also show how gimmick forms got more prevalent, SV would have an insane amount of 1 stage mons cause of paradoxes
