>>57434822Straw men arguments are only legitimate when you use them, correct? You have no idea what Fascism entails. You use it as a catch-all descriptor just as liberally as some use "Communist".
Fascism is characterised by nationalism, an expansionist state that acquires territory by force, opposition to parliamentary democracy, an "efficient totalitarian regime", a "third position" economic system where the state mediates between institutions and classes, and a political system manifesting as a uniquely Fascist form of corporatism which merges state and corporate power.
It is the sum of those tenets, amongst others, that defines "Fascism". Some rando on the internet expressing disgust for the government mass-importing economic migrants who can't go a day without shitting in someone's yard or raping a native chick would have people like you frothing at the mouth to accuse them of being "fascists". But it is not so simple an ideology that it can be defined exclusively and entirely as being socially reluctant about ethnic replacement, therefore pigeonholing a good chunk of any given nation's population into being "fascist" by exaggerating their passion about a single topic. It incorporates that nation, to an extent; but being unenthusiastic about corporate infusion of subversive, destructive rhetoric into entertainment media for malicious purposes has never been fascist in isolation.
