>>57771722>yeahnope
>the proof is [thing that doesn't prove it lacks EVs]kek
>you're a disingenuous shitposterWhich is why I post evidence and you don't, right?
>A random retard claiming there are EVs isn't a sourceWhen his checker is proven accurate yes it is. You claiming the opposite means nothing because you and I are thrones engaged in the debate. He's the only outsider that claimed to check while having no vested interest in this argument, unlike you and I. Again, you haven't posted anything whatsoever that shows that it lacks EVs.
>thanks for admittingCarrying isn't using. Catching a pokemon to have it sit in your party and never battle doesn't actually count as using it.
>You still haven't proven thisIt was (You) who claimed people review bombed the game, but you never proved it.
>Yu still haven't proven thisIt was (You), again, who claimed the snail was meant to be the starter, but you never proved it.
>It wasn't the third line in the dex it was replaced by Samurott.If that were the case, it would have existed in that third line before Samurott. Because that's you know, what it means to be "replaced" as the starter. But it was never the starter to begin with because every instance of it exists all the way down in the seismitoad row.
>full locationsI didn't say this. But you agreed South Kalos were "empty locations", meaning that the game is unfinished.
>still screeching an AI BTFO him without explaining anything about his code being an accurate representation of the game's formulaEveryone's still waiting on you anon.
>Your behavior is so obvious>anyone can easily identify your behaviorOnly a literal schizophrenic says these things, and it's made even funnier when you accuse others of doing exactly what you yourself continue to do.
