>>57791007>doesn't deny itSo we agree organizations can do bad things and still be supported
>Making him nuancedI'm sorry, but what you suggested isn't "nuanced". What we go with grunts being cobbled together for different reasons manipulatively, while the goal of pokemon liberation was never actually discredited is actually nuanced.
>It's just established as evil periodNot the idea of pokemon liberation.
>when they kicked a Pokemon for no reasonIt was for a reason in their eyes. Also, how does this discredit the IDEA of Pokemon liberation?
>Yes it doesNo it doesn't. Games have code, not physical objects.
>things can be there despite you not seeing itNot always in a game, where shit can appear and disappear. Are you not aware that things can move when you aren't looking at them?
>No it didn'tYes it did
>It doesNah, your shitty copypasta doesn't apply.
>copeagain, projecting
>proving a negative is easier than proving a positiveYou claimed something first. Prove it. Me pointing out the fact that you have't proven it doesn't allow you to demand I prove you wrong. Please prove yourself first.
>I doesNah, your shitty copypasta doesn't apply.
>NopeYep. Play the game please.
>ignores the dialogue of their goal of freeing pokemon and the "ends justify the means" mentality they bring upConcession accepted
>NopeYep. Play the game.
