>>57790996He didn't imply that whatsoever.
>>57791000>Prove your claim you brought upI didn't claim anything. You claimed something without evidence and I asked you for evidence. Prove it or fuck off.
>no u claimed it lol here's some copypasta demanding you prove a negative because I'm a retardNo, you claimed it, so until you prove it true to begin with, it's false.
>Evidently notEvidently so since I just read and found out you're a massive liar and never posted anything you claimed you did.
>you didn't prove any of them are lies>post the sourcehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SlzAXoO6CEGo listen to timestamps 1:40 until 1:55
The interviewer asks if they've EVER considered making difficulty options for a pokemon game and they both said no simultaneously.
Not only was it considered, but already done in BW2, so they definitely considered it at some point.
>No one intentionally makes games they don't plan forThat's not the allegation though. People do decide to make games. So a placeholder literally constitutes planning for the game.
>No you didn'tYes I did. A game was planned at some point.
>No it wasn't, with the leaks not proving it.Wrong again, the leaks show that a game was planned at some point.
>It's retarded to distinguish between deciding to make a game and deciding to get into crashes.You know perfectly well these are not equivalent whatsoever, which is why you should have never brought that up. Games are conscious creations. Car accidents are accidents.
