>>57865352>denies the real threat of ulmerhow new are you? but thanks for reminding me, youtumor lovers would need to be banned as well
oh and how about the autistic fighting over competitive? like how smogon or doubles isn't real or whatever
>>57865364>I wouldn't even mind if there was something like 10 dedicated threads to this, but the threads never stop.that's a perfectly acceptable compromise, both sides would be happy with that
>Everyone outside of your circle wants more conversations, even if it results in a slower board. >he didn't read the full post before finishing his replywell, it happens ig, i do it too
>If you truly think there's nothing else to talk about but gooning then you have an obsession. obviously there is but the problem isn't the lack of topics, it's the lack of proper denizens of the 4chan realm
even if the mod team somehow got their act together and banned every schizo shitting up the site, the trouble is then how to attract more regular people who would fit within the 4chan community
i don't mean social media normalfags ftr, i mean people who like the idea of the site and its (old) culture but hate the people who post on it
>It'll make the board more appealing to people who don't want to browse a clogged catalog to find something.that would certainly help but again the problem is when you see roaches infesting a house, you don't go back to that house even when you're told they've been exterminated
trust me i understand your pov, personally i tried to fix multiple generals on /vg/ before but you're being far too naive
look up 'rapeape' in the /v/ archive to see why this website is beyond fixing, and go out in real life if you want to talk to people
>t. someone who should follow his own advice 
