>>57890236>Is it wrong to make love with your Pokemon?Yes. The franchise is against human X Pokémon sex/romance.
>Or are you all just human supremacist who's against interspecies marriage?A Pokémon X Pokémon pairing would still be interspecies if they're different species of Pokémon. And being against human X Pokémon does not necessitate being a human supremacist.
>You do know Pokemons can consent, right? They can say yes or no.And this is the main thing people fail to understand. Just because all species of Pokémon have human-level cognition at minimum and can express yes/no is not enough for human X Pokémon to be right. There many differences to humans and Pokémon. Differences in biology, values, lifestyle, social norms and so on. Notably...
>>57890659And that is exactly one of the major reasons a Pokémon X human romantic relationship would be problematic. How Pokémon and humans have a very specific equal balanced asymmetrical relationship. Making that romantic can cause it many issues, one such one could take advantage of the other.
>>57890688Every instance when the idea of Pokémon X human is brought up it is ambiguous, a joke, shown as antiquated or shown as wrong. There is not a single instance where it is ever unambiguously seriously shown as a positive thing in present day. And that's not because Pokémon is a safe-for-kids franchise either, it's because they want it in the franchise as they don't support it. Also Evolution and Level have nothing to do with a Pokémon's age. Evolution is a change of species.
