>>58003958>Why must the social order be maintained?Because, realisticly, we weren't ready for such changes in the status quo.
Long ago men went to war and conquer, while the women stayed at home with the children. But does this meant they were lesser? Not really.
You see, many people skip the fact that all men are kings at their homes, but is the women who mantains the law. Why do you think the positive aspects of the nuclear family were always pushed? Because it was the way your family's name stayed afloat.
And this is not something like "oh, so you care what others say about you". Families where the father and the mother supported each other while raising their children were the ones who slowly remained in this world. Meanwhile, the men who beat their wives and drank/took drugs either end in prison or dying in a ditch; or the women who slept around ending alone, old, broken both of soul and pocket, and uglier than sin.
Times changed with the evolution of our intelligence. We suddenly have machines that made having families with over 10 children obsolete or a risk, medicine that mantains our bodies in top shape even beyond our 70s and 80s, and then changing the social structure as we know it so everybody is equal regarldess of achievement.
We damn ourselves too quickly, and just now we are realizing it. Women deserve to vote and have a voice? Yes. Men can pick things that aren't seen as "manly"? Yes. Should people desire for same sex individuals or change it? If they can afford and allow it.
But here's the thing: only because you can, doesn't mean that you should.
Women who start to work and vote are feed fake ideas of different pay grades or different treatment in working enviroments.
Men are chastised by being either "too girly", or being "toxic" by showing generic masculine traits.
As for the homos and transexuals, they have been weaponized for both sides of politics just to say "see? We are better than those guys!"
Cont
