>>58046438>RaticateLooks like an actual animal. A giant rat. It would be stranger if such a creature did not exist among Pokemon. Is it amazing? Nope. But it sure as shit isn't the worst creature out there.
>DugtrioYeah, alright. I agree.
>Seel & DewgongSome of the better looking Pokemon in the entire franchise purely for their simplicity of design. There's absolutely nothing wrong with either of them. Are they the most exciting to look at? Nope. But do they do what they're supposed to? Yes.
>Mr. Mime & JynxLet's throw Mewtwo, Drowzee, and Hypno into this one while we're at it. I've never liked humanoid Pokemon. I'm an easy sell when it comes to them being bad. Deoxys is the only one I like, and that's because it literally comes from outer space and is alien in composition. Humanoid done properly.
>MoltresBullshit. While it may be a weak aesthetic compared to best bird Zapdos and most handsome bird Articuno, it's still a fantastic bird and depicts exactly what it's all about.
>BlastoiseGrows an actual fucking cannon out of its shell. It's just not good. It is by far the least aesthetically pleasing, fully-evolved starter from gen I.
Sure, there ARE some worse designs in gen I, but Blastoise ranks pretty fucking low on the roster of good-looking compared to its prior stages of evolution. At least with Bulbasaur -> Venasaur you know what you're getting and get it as advertised.
