[136 / 11 / 1]
Quoted By: >>58051770 >>58051870 >>58052015 >>58052159 >>58052478 >>58052510 >>58052670 >>58052714 >>58052862 >>58054398 >>58054599 >>58057612 >>58057782 >>58057806 >>58058001
Can someone please explain to me why they refuse to rebalance this type?
They made all kinds of defensive-spec ice types, yet seem to be completely unaware that ice is a defensive abomination. It only resists itself and it's weak to several; who is ever going to use a defensive ice type?
While it's pretty useful offensively, the problem is all the main moves are commonly learned. Ice beam can be used by all water types and all dragons. This further diminishes any incentive to have an ice type in your party.
They brought fairy in explicitly to rebalance the game. Why couldn't they just make ice types resist that? I mean why not? It's not like fairies have real world physical properties so you can get creative for the sake of rebalancing. If ice could resist fairy, that would be quite useful because fairy is extremely strong offensively and defensively.
They made all kinds of defensive-spec ice types, yet seem to be completely unaware that ice is a defensive abomination. It only resists itself and it's weak to several; who is ever going to use a defensive ice type?
While it's pretty useful offensively, the problem is all the main moves are commonly learned. Ice beam can be used by all water types and all dragons. This further diminishes any incentive to have an ice type in your party.
They brought fairy in explicitly to rebalance the game. Why couldn't they just make ice types resist that? I mean why not? It's not like fairies have real world physical properties so you can get creative for the sake of rebalancing. If ice could resist fairy, that would be quite useful because fairy is extremely strong offensively and defensively.
