>>58067860>if youre so confident that what she's wearing is not suiting her profession (which contains a multitude of things) then you surely must know what would be more suitable otherwise youre talking shitYeah got it you're playing stupid. It doesn't matter what I say at this point because you'll ignore it like you just ignored the ramifications of Raifort's design conception. You want to use your petty 'design a new look for Cynthia' challenge as a time-wasting irrelevant branch meant only as a pathetic distraction from the fact that you ran out of arguments. Yet you're too dense to realize Raifort already addressed that point at large, as did the rest of my prior post.
It's funny how attentive you suddenly got in the 2nd part of your post as if you dropped the facade of playing stupid, but the context of my post was regarding
>>58067250 and
>>58067687 because you insisted that Shauntal being a writer is her whole profession here
>>58067751 while missing the point of writers not being associated with outfits to begin with when archaeologists ARE associated with outfits to begin with. Divorcing them as matters for conversational purpose to help you understand a very simple concept I've had to repeat to a brick wall, not divorcing them in application when that doesn't even make sense to begin with. A doctor has an outfit, a fireman has an outfit, a policeman has an outfit, etc. This is elementary school level stuff and you actually chased that as your gotcha.
