>>58292908I didn't make the image, I am using it for shorthand to showcase the SV artstyle and how it deviates from GameFreak's roots
Sexual dimorphism:
condition where the two sexes of the same species exhibit different characteristics beyond the differences in their sexual organs
prior to SV, the character designs were far more dimorphic between genders. Girls are allowed to wear bikinis, girls typically wore skirts instead of shorts etc. SURELY you can acknowledge the lack of skirts. Very distinct difference.
1. Yea brown people exist. Don't misconstrue my argument, I never said they didn't. However, gen5's Basketball players and breakdancers in New York had a stronger basis in reality than rapping grandma in Spain. That is why the former isnt woke, the latter arguably is. Because it stands out, against reason.
2. short hair girls are fine and not a problem, Misty isn't woke don't be stupid. You admit woke designs exist in Concord and Starfield. I agree those are MUCH worse than pokemon in this regard. What about the design philosophy of Concord is woke to you?
3. cowgirls obviously aren't the problem
4. me neither. Fair point. I like Mela and Tulip. I don't remember Eli.
5. Yea the NPCs are ugly. If we are all in agreement then GameFreak should've listened to the consensus and reworked how the NPCs were handled for LegendsZA but they didn't seem to. Characters like Mela were hand designed and thats a good thing.
6. what? I dont see the grafitti artist
7.being able to select skin color isn't a problem or new, yes. You can make an Aryan in Starfield too, doesnt make the game not woke. (also Aryan does not mean blue eyed blonde hair. You've been propagandized. Aryans stretched across Europe all the way to Iran)
8. sexual dimorphism. I want to see differences beyond sex organs.
9. No. Obviously. Shorts are fine, but note the disappearance of skirts entirely. Skirts were a staple with lasses and Dawn
10. geeta is fine
