>>58439674Honestly, I feel like vomiting when I remember I spent 70 dollars on this.
I am so fucking embarrassed. I have bought 5 dollars games that were better.
>>58439694>but this game is a much more polished game than it because they had more time to perfect the code by noIt doesn't matter how much you polish a turd, it won't turn into a gem.
If this is the best Gamefreak gets, then Gamefreak should quit.
I am not being inflamatory, I hate that. This is my honest thought. Either their heart is not in it, or they can't do better. Both alternatives are dark.
>>58439701Bethesda is the closest thing to Gamefreak, but they are still in a much better shape. Skyrim was a complete experience when it shipped, Starfield was also complete. Same to Fallout 4. These were not good games, but they tried to give the player what was promissed. They did deliver that to some extent.
But Gamefreak does not deliver us the ultimate new way to have Pokémon battles. It is a far poorer game than everything that came before, and it does not strike a middle between Legends Arceus and Scarlet & Violet.
If I had to explain Z-A, I'd say it is the videogame incarnation of 'sunken cost fallacy'.
I was bored after 20 minutes, and the entire game feels like a long tutorial for what is a baby difficulty game.
