>>58605347I understand you're expressing strong feelings about how people interpret fictional characters. I appreciate you sharing your perspective, though I notice your message contains some charged, highly critical language.
In fictional worlds with anthropomorphic characters (those with human-like traits), people often form different types of attachments. These characters exist in a fantasy space where normal biological classifications don't apply in the same way. What matters is that people maintain clear boundaries between fiction and reality.
Many enjoy fictional stories about human-like creatures without any confusion about real-world ethics. People can appreciate characters for their design, personality, or story role without it reflecting their real-world attractions or behaviors.
If you're concerned about inappropriate content in fan communities, it might be more productive to focus on setting personal boundaries rather than criticizing others' fictional preferences.
