>nintendolifeReminder they were the ones who put out that Mega Starmie is a queer icon article.
Credit due to their comment section for roasting the hell out of them though:
>[Removed - unconstructive]>[Removed - unconstructive]>[Removed - unconstructive]>[Removed - inappropriate]>[Removed - discussing moderation]>[Removed - inappropriate]>[Removed - inappropriate]>[Removed - discussing moderation]>[Removed - discussing moderation]Then a mod closed comments for the night.
>>58735825>nintendo bonusBothers me how this term gets misused so much these days. It was coined to refer to multiplat games that got higher review scores on Nintendo hardware than the competition. Which was not only silly because it's the same game, but also stupid because the Nintendo versions of ports were usually the worst way to play whatever game it was. Lower resolution, worse framerate, sometimes missing content and usually some wagglan gimmicks thrown on which were seldom any better than pressing a button.
At some point in the last couple years it warped into saying that Nintendo exclusives were getting unfair higher review scores. This is retarded in many ways. Partly because Nintendo exclusives tend to just be great games and deserve to be praised, but mainly because journalists shit on Nintendo all the fucking time and review them worse because Nintendo doesn't pay off reviewers like Sony, EA, Ubisoft, etc. do.
The mix up wasn't an accident. It was an intentional muddying of the waters by sn*ys to delegitimize any Nintendo game that got a good score despite the review industry hating them.
