>>58911610It's a long standing problem with Wikipedia in general that fictional characters can only get articles if they have received "individual commentary from notable sources". Big video game websites count as "notable sources", so for the most part the only "notable third-party press" a lot of characters have received is some retard writing some dumb shit like this somewhere. But it has to be added to the article, otherwise the character doesn't count as "notable enough to get an article".
The main example used to be that Freeza from Dragonball got an article because some faggot from IGN could be sourced as calling him "a bad mofo" in a review of some shitty Dragonball game.
