>>104611920Nothing went wrong: Cover is betting everything on long-term investments like the music labels and games, while Niji offers the kind of short-term returns investors look for in a potentially unstable market.
So, if Cover is right, then people okay with the higher risk can make more money in the future because this would basically be a "growing pains" sort of dip; if Cover is wrong, you're better off buying Niji, because they're more interested in maintaining immediate appeal to investors.
>>104638203Niji needs its management to keep spending their own money to keep the company stable; as soon as they decide the company isn't worth the risk of not getting a return on that, Njij is going to collapse in an instant, because it lacks anything with "publicly traded" levels of objective value.
