>>109142262I'm not even the same anon as the first one you were replying to, you are waffling and eagerly blundering ahead with your epic mindreading assumptions like a ledditor.
>Your rejection of agency, accountability, and redemption is ironically supported by the Talmud as far as I know, the Talmud claims that jews are le real actual humans with free will and that goyim are just beasts in human form made to serve the jews (and were only put in human form because being served by an actual beast would be too degrading/insulting for a jew) or something like that. I think free will still exists for jews in this idiosyncatic worldview although I'm not sure what morally bad actions/sin even is in a worldview wherein killing a goyim carries no moral weight at all or where you can rape a 3 year old and it's ok because they are not a fully developed person yet or whatever (I assume such teachings were simply the schizoposts of random rabbi - given that the Talmud is actually just a collection of rabbis schizoposting and debating each other autistically over the Torah and what they think it means in whatever way is convenient for them - and were just adopted as gospel because it fully validates pre-existing behavior).
>though you’ll probably never have enough power to spread as much destruction as him due to impotenceIt's weird that you are making this 'aha, you just disagree with the Talmudic pedo jews because you are just jealous of them and are totally just a psycho like them but ineffectual, all humans are just that evil really' argument and it makes me wonder if you are saying this because you yourself are just such a jew and pathologically assume everyone else thinks the same way but regardless. No, I do not have the same motivations and desires as the likes of Epstein and would not act the same in the same circumstances because I have a moral conscience and empathy and strong disgust responses to immoral behavior.
>I also don’t even grant you the concept of “evil” under your world viewyou have just assumed a straw worldview for me and ran with it
>you have no grounding for its objective existenceevil is the intentional causing of suffering. Malevolence.
People can be naturally inclined to evil and still choose otherwise, there is no contradiction. Although I'm not even sure I would grant you that evil even necessarily has to be tied to absolute free will otherwise it means you end up making arguments like that certain serial killers can't technically be defined as being evil just because you can maybe explain away their behavior as a result of mental damage or something.
If a group of people are predisposed to keep choosing to do malevolent and destructive behavior over and over and over again then I am happy to simply categorize said entire group of people as just evil. To not do so is simply pragmatically and functionally not useful or conducive to survival and wellbeing anyway.
