>>110076611Word policing while fundamentally misunderstanding the meaning of those words? Color me shocked.
That stupidity aside, you're making a lot of assumptions here. First is the idea that you can only have a valid opinion on what's going on if you're directly involved. That's bullshit.
Second is that similar circumstances somehow don't exist, that other similar problems have never happened before to others or to the poster themselves and that they're speaking out of ignorance. You have literally zero way of knowing that but you're running with that anyway, ironically, out of ignorance.
Third is thinking the poster is somehow "emotionally blinded" and "tricking themselves" into thinking they're "on the same level of awareness" of someone else. Boy, you don't have any fucking idea what you're saying with that statement. At all.
It wouldn't be an assumption to call you a fucking retard based on the clear and repeated insistence (
>>110076793)
that you don't understand what parasocial behavior actually is, it would be a set in stone fact.
English may or may not be your first language but regardless of that you clearly don't understand it as well as you think you do and you have no business playing at being a grammar nazi.
That said: Grimmi is not handling this the right way. It's the same playbook many MANY others use to stir up shit when they don't have enough information to make a clear cut statement and are upset over perceived slights against them. It's also worth noting that Grimmi has a track record of making financially retarded decisions. Taking that loan from MSM so she could take over selling the hot sauce was a monumentally stupid decision and she literally ended up paying for it. Now she's showing two 'possible' instances of skimming, outright calling it skimming AFTER leaving the company and then refusing to elaborate further and preemptively shutting down future discussion.
Unless she has granite-hard facts and numbers that proves this was a pattern of willful theft, she's putting herself at risk of a defamation case.
If she HAD actual proof then a public call out like she did is not the right play to make, going straight to a lawyer would be.
