>>98763753>make F4M content catering specifically to a male audience primarily from the GFE angle to be as successful as possibleThis is the entire gist. F4M is THE base for the company, and doing anything but that (or F4A at the least) is going to not be as successful just via sheer market share.
It's fine to be there, but should not be the main course, because it's effort that largely goes unappreciated (and is therefore somewhat a waste) comparative to F4M or F4A. The "no F4F" is solely a business decision, because F4F performs worse than F4M or F4A, and when this is about making a living, why intentionally make it worse?
-Investor- has one F4F video, and she said it grossly underperformed (which is especially a big deal because it's a collab with Sinder), and that's the experience she said she based the content policy for VAllure on.That and if you remember early on we had a few sexpest """women""" who kept begging for F4F and I wish nothing but suffering on these people, and because Stronny has a psychic connection to (me), she continues the policy.
